Background
Methods
Pain-free individuals (n = 200) participated in a quantitative sensory testing protocol assessing inhibition (via conditioned pain modulation (CPM)) and hedonic (via pleasant pain relief (PPR)) responses. CPM paradigm involved a tonic heat stimulation, administered before and after a CPT at 10°C. CPM magnitude was calculated as the change in pain ratings following the conditioning stimulus. PPR magnitude was quantified using participants’ subjective perception of pain relief immediately following cessation of the CPT. A k-means clustering analysis based on four principal variables was performed to identify distinct response sub-groups.
Results
Four clusters provided an optimal solution and explained 58% of the total variance. Cluster 1 demonstrated high CPM and moderate PPR response. In contrast, Cluster 2 demonstrated weak CPM and strong PPR. Cluster 3 appears to be similar to Cluster 2. Finally, Cluster 4 was characterized by both weak CPM and weak PPR associated with low pain perception during the CPT.
Conclusion
This study supports that two distinct phenomena pre-exist, one leading to inhibition and the other to compensation. Although distinct, there appear to be complementary, with the PPR being stronger in individuals with weaker CPM responses.
Significance Statement
This study highlights the recruitment of a potential hedonic compensatory mechanism when inhibitory resources are insufficient to cope with pain.