Categorizing Trends in Anesthesiology Residency Applicants’ Research Portfolios and Impact on Matching: A Program-Level Study

Authors: Holloway J et al.

Anesthesia & Analgesia, February 9, 2026, 10.1213/ANE.0000000000007977

This single-program retrospective study examined how research involvement among anesthesiology residency applicants correlates with the likelihood of being ranked-to-match and how portfolio characteristics vary by applicant background.

The investigators analyzed applications from interviewed US-MD and US-DO applicants and categorized research experiences in detail, including peer-reviewed publications and anesthesiology-specific work. The primary outcome was association between research experience and being ranked-to-match.

Key Findings

  1. Any research experience
    Applicants with at least one research experience had more than twice the odds of being ranked-to-match compared with those without research (OR 2.16, P < .001).

  2. Peer-reviewed publications
    Applicants with at least one peer-reviewed publication had increased odds of ranked-to-match (OR 2.25, P < .001).

  3. Anesthesiology-specific research
    At least one anesthesiology-related research experience was associated with higher odds of ranked-to-match (OR 1.76, P < .001).

  4. Degree type differences
    US-MD applicants were significantly more likely than US-DO applicants to report at least one research experience (P < .001).

  5. Institutional affiliation
    Applicants from medical schools affiliated with an anesthesiology residency program were more likely to report research experience than those from unaffiliated schools (P < .001).

  6. Step 1 Pass/Fail era
    Applicants from the Pass/Fail USMLE Step 1 era were more likely to report at least one research experience compared with those from the scored Step 1 era (P < .001), suggesting applicants may be compensating for loss of numeric differentiation with research output.

Interpretation

This study reinforces what many program directors suspect: research experience—particularly peer-reviewed and anesthesia-related work—is associated with improved competitive positioning.

However, several nuances are important:

• The study measured association with ranked-to-match, not actual match outcomes across programs nationally.
• It reflects a single institution’s selection environment.
• Research productivity may function both as a marker of motivation and as a proxy for institutional opportunity.

The affiliation findings are particularly noteworthy. Applicants from schools with anesthesiology residency programs have built-in research access, mentorship, and exposure advantages. Likewise, the MD vs DO difference likely reflects structural opportunity rather than ability.

The Step 1 Pass/Fail observation suggests a shifting equilibrium in application strategy: when test score differentiation decreases, research becomes a more visible competitive signal.

Key Points

• Any research experience roughly doubles odds of being ranked-to-match at the program studied.
• Peer-reviewed publications show similar magnitude association.
• Anesthesiology-specific research confers additional advantage.
• US-MD and residency-affiliated schools are associated with greater research reporting.
• Post–Step 1 Pass/Fail applicants report more research experiences.

What You Should Know

For academic anesthesia programs, this study suggests that research remains a meaningful selection differentiator, especially in the evolving Pass/Fail era.

For applicants without home-program affiliation or structured research access, this may create structural inequities.

From a program leadership perspective, this paper supports deliberate reflection on:

• How heavily research is weighted relative to clinical attributes
• Whether review processes unintentionally favor access over merit
• Transparent communication to applicants regarding expectations

In the broader anesthesia workforce context—particularly given your experience with staffing models and academic-community balance—this trend underscores increasing academic pressure in residency entry, even as many graduates ultimately practice outside research-intensive environments.

Thank you to Anesthesia & Analgesia for allowing us to summarize and share this article.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *