Accuracy and Feasibility of Clinically Applied Frailty Instruments before Surgery

AUTHORS: Sylvie D. Aucoin, M.D., M.Sc., F.R.C.P.C. et al
Anesthesiology 7 2020, Vol.133, 78-95.
Background: A barrier to routine preoperative frailty assessment is the large number of frailty instruments described. Previous systematic reviews estimate the association of frailty with outcomes, but none have evaluated outcomes at the individual instrument level or specific to clinical assessment of frailty, which must combine accuracy with feasibility to support clinical practice.

Methods: The authors conducted a preregistered systematic review (CRD42019107551) of studies prospectively applying a frailty instrument in a clinical setting before surgery. Medline, Excerpta Medica Database, Cochrane Library and the Comprehensive Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane databases were searched using a peer-reviewed strategy. All stages of the review were completed in duplicate. The primary outcome was mortality and secondary outcomes reflected routinely collected and patient-centered measures; feasibility measures were also collected. Effect estimates were pooled using random-effects models or narratively synthesized. Risk of bias was assessed.

Results: Seventy studies were included; 45 contributed to meta-analyses. Frailty was defined using 35 different instruments; five were meta-analyzed, with the Fried Phenotype having the largest number of studies. Most strongly associated with: mortality and nonfavorable discharge was the Clinical Frailty Scale (odds ratio, 4.89; 95% CI, 1.83 to 13.05 and odds ratio, 6.31; 95% CI, 4.00 to 9.94, respectively); complications was associated with the Edmonton Frail Scale (odds ratio, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.52 to 5.65); and delirium was associated with the Frailty Phenotype (odds ratio, 3.79; 95% CI, 1.75 to 8.22). The Clinical Frailty Scale had the highest reported measures of feasibility.

Conclusions: Clinicians should consider accuracy and feasibility when choosing a frailty instrument. Strong evidence in both domains support the Clinical Frailty Scale, while the Fried Phenotype may require a trade-off of accuracy with lower feasibility.

Editor’s Perspective:

What We Already Know about This Topic:

  • Preoperative frailty has been associated with adverse postoperative outcomes

  • It remains unclear which frailty scale is the best predictor of adverse postoperative outcomes

What This Article Tells Us That Is New:

  • This meta-analysis of 45 articles identified that specific frailty scales may be better predictors for some adverse outcomes when compared to others

  • The Clinical Frailty Scale was most strongly associated with mortality and discharge not to home

  • The Edmonton Frail Scale was a better predictor of complications

  • The Frailty phenotype was most strongly associated with postoperative delirium

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *