I thought this was interesting so I wanted to include it for our readers.
Life expectancy increases as aerobic fitness improves with no upper limit of benefit at any age. The generally accepted inverse relation between cardiovascular fitness and adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality has been challenged recently by reports that suggest a possible U-shaped dose-response association, in which extreme exercise and fitness is associated with excess mortality risk due to myocardial fibrosis, atrial fibrillation, and coronary artery calcification. This retrospective cohort study overcame the limitations of many studies in which self-reported exercise patterns were used. Cleveland Clinic researchers identified 122,000 patients (mean age, 53) who were referred for symptom-limited exercise treadmill testing. According to peak achieved metabolic equivalents (METs; similar to maximal oxygen uptake), patients were stratified into five cardiorespiratory-fitness (CRF) groups: low, below average, above average, high, and elite. During median follow-up of 8 years, researchers noted an inverse relation between level of CRF and all-cause mortality across all performance levels and through age >70. For example, mortality hazard ratios (HRs) were 1.3 for high vs. elite CRF, 1.8 for above-average vs. elite CRF, and 1.4 for below-average vs. above-average CRF. Hazard ratios were adjusted for traditional cardiovascular risk factors. |
|
|
COMMENT
These data are reassuring that, with regard to mortality, one can exercise safely at an “elite” level throughout life. But those who aren’t interested in achieving (or able to achieve) elite levels still will derive mortality benefits when they improve their cardiorespiratory fitness.